I. RELEVANCE CRITERION
The Relevance Criterion is the expectation that the parts of an argument
have a material impact on the discussion. Irrelevant assertions (sometimes
called non sequiturs) are those which do not provide necessary evidence
and have no bearing on the truth or falsehood of an conclusion. Thus they
cannot lead to a defensible conclusion.
|
|
A. Fallacies of Irrelevance
Fallacies of irrelevance are assertions which may be factual but which do
not contribute support to an argument.
|
1. Irrelevant or Questionable Authority
(Assertion not taken from competent source)
|
"Didn't you hear? Oprah said she was worried about mad cow disease!"
"My cousin Dave told me he heard somebody say this stock was going up, so we should invest
in it now."
|
2. Appeal to Common Opinion
(Assertion not based on facts, but rather on popularity)
|
"It's really popular, so it must be OK."
"All the opinion polls say the president's popularity is very high, so it's
clear that he's doing a good job."
|
3. Genetic Fallacy
(Assertion based on the supposition that whatever a thing was in the
past, it always remains so)
|
"It was originally good/bad, so it must be right/wrong today."
"How can you vote Republican? Don't you know they were the party
of segregation in the 1950's?"
|
4. Rationalization
(Assertion based on plausible but irrelevant reasons)
|
"Well, I didn't really like that color on a dress, anyway."
"We already had troops in Europe at the end of WW II; we should have
gone ahead and fought Russia while we were there."
|
5. Drawing the Wrong Conclusion
(Assertions are relevant but don't lead to stated conclusion)
|
"A, and B, and C; therefore 97."
|
6. Using the Wrong Reasons
(Conclusion is reasonable but assertions are irrelevant)
|
"13; because X, and Y, and Z."
|
|
B. Irrelevant Emotional Appeals
Irrelevant emotional appeals are assertions which rely not on objective
facts but on inducing emotional reactions in listeners.
|
1. Appeal to Pity
(Assertion based on sympathy instead of objective evidence)
|
"Bad things have happened to me, so you should accept my conclusion."
"I say that all marriages are violent, and I've still got the scars my
ex- left me to prove it."
|
2. Appeal to Force or Threat
(Assertion based on threat of harm instead of on relevant facts)
|
"If you don't accept my conclusion, bad things will happen to you."
"If you don't permit a confirmation hearing for an ambassador I like,
I'll bottle up money for your state in my committee."
|
3. Appeal to Tradition
(Assertion based on reverence for past actions)
|
"We've stood for/against X for decades; you'll hurt us if you argue
that we do otherwise."
"My father was a doctor, I'm a doctor--what do YOU want to be?"
|
4. Appeal to Personal Circumstances or Motives
(Assertion based on substituting listener's self-interest for objective
analysis of general evidence)
|
"You'll suffer disproportionate loss if you don't support/reject X."
"You shouldn't vote for her. You're about to start getting a Social
Security check, but she supports raising the start-of-benefits age."
|
5. Exploitation of Strong Feelings or Attitudes
(Assertion based on emotionalism)
|
"X is very good/bad; I'm for/against it, therefore I am
a good person; if you want to be considered good, too, you'll agree
with whatever I propose to do about it."
"We believe it's wrong to slash school lunch programs that keep
children from going to bed hungry, as the other party proposes."
|
6. Use of Flattery
(Assertion based on listener's desire to remain well-thought-of by
arguer)
|
"A smart person like you can surely see that . . ."
"I've heard a lot of good things about you, so I know I can count on
your support."
|
7. Assigning Guilt by Association
(Assertion based on threatening loss of respect for listener)
|
"Sure. Stalin probably favored a single national language, too."
"I don't understand how you can support that candidate. Didn't you
hear that the Ku Klux Klan has endorsed him?"
"His remarks probably sounded better in the original German."
|